Agency
Adults retain ordinary purchasing autonomy. A legal caffeine purchase does not justify an identity checkpoint.
Caffeine 404 is a bilingual protest against Quebec Bill 9. It asks why an adult buying a legal drink should lose online access or face an identity check because the container is a can.
This checkout records zero purchases and zero identity data.
A completely fictional citrus energy drink experiencing regulatory difficulties.
A legal caffeine purchase should require neither age assurance nor government identification. The online-sales ban should disappear with the rest of the Act.
PDF // ENGLISHRepeal the Act. Do not replace section 3 with another verification system.
Keep lawful remote purchases available without an identity check.
Remove purchaser offences and the power to demand photo identification.
If repeal fails, limit any fallback to a seller-side rule for in-person sales to people under 16.

An adult could choose an energy drink at a dépanneur without turning caffeine into an identity event. Bill 9 replaces that ordinary access with a controlled category.
The Act creates an under-16 limit at the point of sale. Section 4 goes further by making physical co-presence the default for future online sales.
Adults retain ordinary purchasing autonomy. A legal caffeine purchase does not justify an identity checkpoint.
Bill 9 makes a legal purchase an identity-controlled event without proving that its product category predicts harm. Section 4 disables a channel used by lawful purchasers.
An ordinary low-stakes purchase should create no identity transaction. Section 3 should be repealed with the rest of the Act.
Delivery is part of everyday access for adults who cannot reliably travel to a retailer.
When a legal purchase depends on where your body is and which ID you carry, the policy is regulating the customer as much as the drink.
The enacted text, section by section.
A covered beverage must meet the 150 mg/L threshold and contain added substances of the kind named in the Act, including taurine or certain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded by default.
A seller or employee may ask for proof that the purchaser is at least 16, using qualifying photo ID from a government or public body. The Act leaves the frequency of checks to sellers and contains no copying requirement.
Once this section begins, sales without the physical presence of the purchaser and seller or employee are prohibited, including Internet and vending-machine sales, subject to regulatory exceptions.
Giving a covered energy drink away is treated as a sale. The sale and purchase rules apply with the necessary modifications.
The Act establishes fines for prohibited conduct, with higher ranges for merchants and doubled minimums and maximums for subsequent offences.
This tracker records official milestones without collecting subscribers or visitor data.
The enacted text is 2026, chapter 11.
Sections other than section 4, plus the related parts of sections 7 to 9, are scheduled to come into force.
The online-sales restriction begins only when the first regulation under section 4 comes into force.
Future regulations or consultations will be added here after comparison with the official publication.
The feed contains site updates only. It has no email list and no subscriber database.
Coffee can contain more caffeine than the fictional can shown here. Bill 9 still treats them differently because the category depends on an ingredient test and express exemptions.
It crosses the concentration threshold and may be covered when it also contains qualifying additional ingredients.
Health Canada supplies the average values for the non-energy entries. Concentrations were calculated from serving values; the fictional can remains illustrative.
The can values come from the Canadian product pages linked below. At Health Canada's average filter-coffee strength, a 591 mL cup works out to roughly 446 mg and remains excluded by default.

*The estimate scales Health Canada's 179 mg average for 237 mL of filter coffee to 591 mL; brew strength varies. Brand marks identify the pictured products, and Caffeine 404 is independent of their owners.
We call a giant coffee office culture. Put the same stimulant in a fluorescent can and we start judging the customer.
A moral panic turns a person or practice into a folk devil and treats it as a threat to social order; the response then grows faster than the evidence supporting its breadth. The original health concern may still be real.
Caffeine can disturb sleep and aggravate some cardiovascular or anxiety symptoms. Health Canada uses lower recommended daily limits for children and adolescents than for adults.
Concentration starts the test. Added substances and express exemptions decide which beverages cross the legal line.
A 237 mL filter-drip coffee averages 179 mg of caffeine according to Health Canada, yet coffee is excluded by default.
The branded can carries an image of a reckless young gamer. That image makes a blanket restriction feel obvious before the evidence has done the work.
No Quebec population study cited here establishes the share of autistic or ADHD adults who buy energy drinks. Quebec should collect population data before section 4 begins, because individual accounts explain personal choices without measuring customer prevalence.
No Quebec source cited here counts affected adults who rely on delivery.These are the arguments most likely to be offered in defence of the Act, followed by this site's response.
No. A concern about youth caffeine use does not justify identity controls on adults or purchaser offences. It also does not justify a ban on lawful remote sales. Public education and accurate labels can address health information without turning an ordinary purchase into an identity event.
No. Section 3 makes access depend on possessing and presenting qualifying government photo ID whenever a seller asks. The absence of mandatory copying does not remove the unequal burden on adults without that document or on people who face profiling.
The Act applies a concentration threshold before an ingredient test and express exclusions. It does not classify beverages by caffeine dose alone. A filter coffee can contain more caffeine than an energy drink, so the category line requires evidence beyond cultural comfort with the cup.
Not under the fallback proposed here. If the legislature refuses complete repeal, it can place a narrow duty on in-person sellers without creating a purchaser offence or authorizing an ID demand. Remote purchases can remain lawful.
The section 4 regulation will decide the practical effect. Quebec has published no accessibility study addressing the burdens set out below.
People who depend on delivery because leaving home is difficult may lose a purchasing channel that other adults take for granted.
Online checkout can spare someone a crowded store and an improvised conversation with a cashier.
A rural customer may face a long drive for limited stock, especially without reliable transit.
When proof is requested, an adult unable to produce the specified document can be refused an otherwise lawful purchase.
An extra store trip takes money and time. The cost rises when it means missing paid work or finding replacement care.
An ID request has a higher personal cost for someone who has already faced surveillance or identity-based harassment.
For someone who cannot reliably reach a store, online access is access.
Bill 9 can concern people who never buy energy drinks. It makes identification relevant to a low-stakes legal purchase and leaves the rules for remote verification to a future regulation. The current requirements stop short of uploads, copied ID, biometrics, or digital storage. Section 3 should still be repealed, and remote sales should require no age assurance.
A reusable digital identity record would create another point of failure in a breach and another dataset that could be joined to purchasing behaviour. People who already encounter profiling or identity-based scrutiny would bear more of that risk. An ordinary caffeine purchase gives the state no reason to request identity. A driver's licence or passport is integral to the activity it authorizes. Buying a legal can is different.
For a disabled adult who relies on delivery, section 4 removes an ordinary choice in the name of protection. Disability rights include the freedom to make everyday decisions that other people dislike.
The blocked checkout exists only in the browser and creates no customer record.
The product card is a user-interface demonstration.
Language and letter choices remain in the browser session.
Advertising pixels and visitor profiles are absent from this page.
Its practical action feature prepares a letter for an MNA.
Choose the issue that applies to you, then add only the detail you want an MNA to read. Nothing entered here is sent or saved by this page.
BROWSER SESSION ONLY // NO TRANSMISSIONI am asking you to repeal Bill 9 because section 4 removes an ordinary purchasing option from disabled adults who rely on delivery. Dignity of risk includes making everyday decisions about legal products without an identity checkpoint.
Start with the repeal request or choose the issue you know best. Review the text before you copy it into your own message.
The application passes the normalized postal code through the Caffeine 404 server to Open North's Represent service; our code does not intentionally persist it, although service infrastructure can produce request logs and Open North says its servers log web requests. Postal codes can cross riding boundaries, so confirm the result on the official MNA page.
If a grown adult cannot be trusted to order a clearly labelled caffeinated drink online, consistency requires one clean solution: prohibit coffee, tea, cola, chocolate, pre-workout, and every office Keurig.
Universal prohibition: equal treatment for the respectable cup.The source room identifies the enacted text. Calculations and policy positions are labelled separately, and corrections are published in place.
Section descriptions and commencement dates come from the enacted Act and the National Assembly record. Official texts prevail.
Concentrations divide listed milligrams by serving litres. The 591 mL coffee estimate scales Health Canada's 179 mg average for 237 mL.
The page marks claims that lack Quebec population data, including the number of affected neurodivergent adults and delivery users.
The repeal demand and rejection of age assurance are policy positions. The fallback described here is also an advocacy proposal.
Send a source-backed correction through the public contact route on the domain record or contact the site owner directly. Material corrections will change the affected passage and the verification date. No submission form or visitor database is used here.
The official English text of 2026, chapter 11.
OPEN SOURCEHISTORYLegislative stages, amendments, votes, and commencement information.
OPEN SOURCEDATAOfficial average caffeine values for coffee, tea, cola, and other foods.
OPEN SOURCEACCESSFederal accessibility guidance on multiple delivery methods and unnecessary burdens.
OPEN SOURCEPRIVACYThe privacy regulator's guidance on requests to inspect identity documents.
OPEN SOURCECIVIC DATAOpen North's postal-code service supplies MNA contact data for the lookup tool.
OPEN SOURCELOOKUP PRIVACYThe provider describes the request information recorded in its server logs.
OPEN SOURCEThe cart has no commerce backend and cannot accept payment; its tools support lawful civic advocacy. Use the official legislation and regulations as the governing text, and ask a lawyer about an individual case.
Caffeine 404 is independent of the beverage brands shown and the Government of Quebec.